Home    Mission    Events    Magazine    Education    Forum    Store    Join    Contact    Links
 
RIGHTS ALERT

PUBLIC SERVANT

VIOLATION   

PERPETRATED AGAINST

Douglas Landers
Hill County, Hillsboro, TX.


- Our Emblem -
Support the cause of freedom!
Patches in 3.5" and 10"
GET YOURS TODAY!!

Peace Officer, Criminal Violation of Private Individual, (We the People)

Note: The Order of Constitution Defenders supports all of our Peace Offers who defends our Unalienable Rights as mandated by the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and the Constitution supported by their Oath so help me God

 

Bill of Rights/ Civil Law Procedure Case
Hillsboro, TX, Hills County

We have a Rill of  Rights,  violation of one of our own, Defender County Chairman, Garry Landers,  Son, Douglas Landers in Hill County Texas.

 

FOUNDATIONS of the LAWFUL POSITION

FACT #1: RIGHTS ARE ABSOLUTE AND NOT SUBJECT TO FEDERAL OR STATE CONGRESSIONAL LAW ..

FACT #2: Constitutional Rights and arguments are just as valid today as there were in 1776. It is written on the paper. They are Unalienable, meaning non changeable, non transferable, cannot be given up except by the person who processes it. Blacks Law Dictionary. You cannot codify or case law what is endowed by the Creator. All cases can be rechallenged on the valitily of the postion by a jury of your peers.

FACT #3: All law officers swear an Oath to the Constitution, "SO HELP ME GOD": They did not swear this Oath to the State or Federal Congress or to the local District Attorney or the Judge or any public office except the Constitution. This is a absolute in position of argument of Truth in Law.

FACT #4: All Public Servants work for, " We the People" and one example of this is demonstrated in the second paragraph, second line down of the Declaration of Independence which states: " To secure these Rights Governments are instituted among men", It did not say Men or instituted among Governments, making it very clear that Peace Officers were created by, "We the People" to secure their Rights not to criminal violate, abuse or disrespect them.

FACT #5: All Statutes, Codes, Rules or Regulations must stand Constitutional validity otherwise they are null and void.

FACT #6: It is the responsibility of each Peace Officer to protect the Rights of, "We the People" above all other Law, then other Statutes or Codes can be considered.

FACT #7: The, Individual, representative of,. "We the People" is superior to Public Servants position unless they perpetrate a Rights violation to another Individual, referred to as the Sovereign, defined in Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd edition. Therefore: absolute respect must be given unless a confliction of a Rights violation occurs. This is what defines a free Society of, "We the People", which are not in contractual bondage as subjects of the State.

FACT #8: The Individual, Sovereign has unlimited liability self evident in logic otherwise he or she would not be Sovereign as given by the Creator, vested in supreme authority.

FACT #9: No contract can stand under duress, fraud or non-disclosure. It is null and void

FACT #10: Any Peace Officer, Civil Law Procedure actions in a traffic stop of an individual must take in absolute consideration of their fundamental Constitutional understanding and is responsible for the Rights, as demonstrated above in FACT #2, Declaration of Independence,  of this individual weather they understand these Rights or Not. Ignorance of the Law on the Individual's position is an excuse. Ignorance of the Law on the Officer's part is no excuse.

Note: FACT 11 is a Staute position and not a Constitutional issue

FACT #11: FCC states that anyone operating on Radar Band must be license by them. Does this Peace Officer have a license from the FCC. Has it been calibrated?

 

DESCRIPTION of INCIDENT

The bottom line skinny of this infraction was Douglas was stop, detained and accused of traveling 40 mph in a 30 mph zone by a public servant and because he refused to sign his signature on the ticket form, his Right not to be coerced into a forced agreement or contract, There can be no involuntary servitude  Article 13 Bill of Rights and because Douglas ask the officer to show him the evidence of the speed he was traveling which is a verbal challenge to the officers position of law. Right to face his private accuser and  burden of proof is on the State, not the Private, the arresting officer, Corporal Jose Orozco belligerently took him into custody and booked him in down town Hillsboro, TX. at the Hillsboro City Jail in order to force him to under duress to comply to his demands and caused Douglas to be put in a reckless endangerment situation without him being convicted of any crime which is incarceration and damages to the Private, (Douglas) with, No Due Process of Law?

Now! Regardless of what a public servant officer thinks is the law base on his training which purely is about Statutes and Codes his first responsibility is to Douglas's Inalienable Rights base on his Oath and the responsibility to his Oath defined in the Declaration of Independence listed in the foundations of law, FACT # 2.  If he does not do this he is in felony breech of his fiduciary duty to the Constitution and Bill of Rights which puts him in what is called an Outlaw position.

Constitutionally, the first violation of Rights took place when he was detained by the officer which demanded zzzzzzz papers know as licenses and registration please. Nazi Germany, 1930, internal travel papers,  Court Case Miller verses US demonstrates a Right cannot be converted into crime based on the lack of paper. Article 5 prohibits you having to give personal information, by force to a agent of the courts that can be used against you in a court of law. For the officer to demand papers for travel, Article 13 Bill of Rights, mandates that there can be no involuntary servitude or force contracts. The question is Hillsboro incorporated. Under the Constitution there to be a speculation of a crime there has to be a private accuser and there can be no crime without damages on the individual's part. Where is the damaged party?

His father was then told that to bring the money down to the precinct that night to satisfy the speeding ticket. Douglas was data based on the Texas district Fusion Center as well. No official visit to the Magistrate Judge to determine the merits of the officer's claim of crime or charge or court date was established before this demand for the money and therefore it was detainment,  punishment which constitute damages without due process before his chance for justice. Basically they kidnapped him, committed a conspiracy to extorted money without, court date or proceedings which is violation of their own civil law procedure? Also, Douglas, weather he understood or not has Unalienable Rights guarantied by the Declaration of Independence, the Supreme Law of the Land.

Another infraction and separate issue on Douglas was the fact that there has just passed and signed by the Governor effective immediately before this event took place a State Statue Texas Law that prohibits personal data being entered into the Fusion Centers on pull over and  detainment. The Fusion Center State Senate Bill 3324 if this case is proceeded by violation of  what Government calls Civil Rights. Civil Rights are not Rights but privileges given by a State or Federal Government but this is a valid argument. 

 

 UNDERSTANDING the LAW and DUTY

Law enforcement has more and more infringed on these Rights on the premise that you have contracted them by consent to the State and Federal Statutes and that the Common law has been codify into Congressional, corporate law by case law. This is not true. How can Corporate law over rule what was mandated to be Unalienable and given by the Creator and how can there not be a contradiction of their Oath to the Constitution in this matter? If they are working on the argument of consent that consent has to be done with open disclosure of what they are giving up with no duress or fraud involved otherwise the contract is repugnant to the Constitution and is null and void, "Mabury verses Madison" & "Norton verses Shelby". 

 Now this opens up arguments in Bill of Rights, Civil Law Procedure, Contract Law, etc.,  No matter how many Congressional Statutes that are created from State Congress or the Federal Congress no Statue, Code, Rule or Regulation can over ride what has been mandated in the Founding Documents as self evident and giving by the Creator. The Right to Travel not permission to drive has been well documented through our case history and is very relevant in this case.  

This crime has been committed upon Douglas and the community of Hillsboro and the public servants that participated in this crime should be fired and prosecuted. If this is not dealt with then who is next to have this done to them in disrespect to there Rights? Make a statement here that this kind of abuse is got to stop and law enforcement must respect their Oath to the Constitution as well as the Statutory laws not in conflict with the Constitution

 

DOCUMENTS OF EVIDENCE

 

LOGIC AND THE LAW

The question #1. is the Bill of Rights still invoked in our modern society or are you simply a subject of the State classified as a statutory citizen? Unless you as the Private decide to contract for your security with a corporation then your Un-Alienable Rights are applicable to your position as originally found to be self evident in The Declaration of Independence. One understanding for this is that Article 13 of the Bill of Rights is fact that there can no involuntary servitude therefore there cannot be any forced contracts. Another words no one can hold a gun to your head to get you to agree to sign? The question in law then becomes was the contract disclosed to you with this understanding that you would comply with the Statutes, Codes, Rules or Regulations or was there fraud, duress or non-disclosure involved therefore propagating the perception of negating your true Creator Given Rights. This action would null and void any contracts with the State. This would then put you in a true position and in full application relating to the Constitution, Declaration of Independence and the, Bill of Rights?

 

This Blog is to be updated on a continuously basis

 

 CALL TO ACTION TO ALL DEFENDERS: 

WE WELCOME YOUR FEEDBACK ON  THIS POSTIING AT OUR DEFENDER FORUM ON THE WEBSITE LISTED BELOW.  ANY INFORMATION THAT YOU MAY CONTRIBUTE WILL BE WELCOMED

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS ARTICLE TO ANYWHERE IT CAN BE EFFECTIVE IN WEBSITES, NEWSPAPERS, FACE BOOK, ETC. LETS CARRY ON THE RIGHTEOUS POSITION OF TRUTH AND JUSTICE. WE MUST BE ALL FOR ONE AND ONE FOR ALL

    Eric Kiesche, National Chairman/ Founder/ Writer/ Designer/ The Spike! for our Republic  

    "The Order of Constitution Defenders"

CONSTITUTIONDEFENDER.COM

 

Houston, Texas/ Chattanooga, Tennessee
All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2007-2009: Constitution Defender