Peace Officer,
Criminal Violation of Private Individual, (We the
People)
Note: The Order of Constitution Defenders supports
all of our Peace Offers who defends our Unalienable Rights as mandated by the
Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and the Constitution supported by
their Oath so help me God
Bill of Rights/ Civil Law Procedure Case
Hillsboro, TX, Hills County
We have a Rill of Rights, violation of
one of our own, Defender County Chairman, Garry Landers,
Son, Douglas Landers in Hill County Texas.
FOUNDATIONS of the LAWFUL POSITION
FACT #1: RIGHTS ARE ABSOLUTE AND NOT
SUBJECT TO FEDERAL OR STATE CONGRESSIONAL LAW
..
FACT #2:
Constitutional Rights and arguments are just as valid today
as there were in 1776. It is written on the paper. They
are Unalienable, meaning non changeable, non
transferable, cannot be given up except by the person
who processes it. Blacks Law Dictionary. You cannot
codify or case law what is endowed by the Creator. All cases can be rechallenged on
the valitily of the postion by a jury of your peers.
FACT #3:
All law officers swear an Oath to the Constitution, "SO
HELP ME GOD": They did not swear this Oath to the State
or Federal Congress or to the local District Attorney or
the Judge or any public office except the Constitution.
This is a absolute in position of argument of Truth in
Law.
FACT #4:
All Public Servants work for, " We the People" and one
example of this is demonstrated in the second paragraph,
second line down of the Declaration of Independence
which states: " To
secure these Rights
Governments are instituted among men", It did not say
Men or instituted among Governments, making it very
clear that Peace Officers were created by, "We the
People" to secure their Rights not to criminal violate,
abuse or disrespect them.
FACT #5:
All Statutes, Codes, Rules or Regulations must stand
Constitutional validity otherwise they are null and
void.
FACT #6:
It is the responsibility of each Peace Officer to
protect the Rights of, "We the People" above all other
Law, then other Statutes or Codes can be considered.
FACT #7:
The, Individual, representative of,. "We the People" is
superior to Public Servants position unless they
perpetrate a Rights violation to another Individual,
referred to as the Sovereign, defined in Blacks Law
Dictionary, 2nd edition. Therefore: absolute respect
must be given unless a confliction of a Rights violation
occurs. This is what defines a free Society of, "We the
People", which are not in contractual bondage as
subjects of the State.
FACT #8:
The Individual, Sovereign has unlimited liability self
evident in logic otherwise he or she would not be
Sovereign as given by the Creator, vested in supreme
authority.
FACT #9:
No contract can stand under duress, fraud or
non-disclosure. It is null and void
FACT #10:
Any Peace Officer, Civil Law Procedure actions in a
traffic stop of an individual must take in absolute
consideration of their fundamental Constitutional
understanding and is responsible for the Rights, as
demonstrated above in FACT #2, Declaration of
Independence, of this individual weather they
understand these Rights or Not. Ignorance of the Law on
the Individual's position is an excuse. Ignorance of the
Law on the Officer's part is no excuse.
Note: FACT 11 is a Staute position and not a
Constitutional issue
FACT
#11:
FCC states that anyone operating on Radar Band must be
license by them. Does this Peace Officer have a license
from the FCC. Has it been calibrated?
DESCRIPTION
of INCIDENT
The bottom line skinny of this infraction was Douglas
was stop, detained and accused of traveling 40 mph in a 30 mph zone by a
public servant and
because he refused to sign his signature on the ticket
form,
his Right not to be coerced
into a forced agreement or contract,
There can be no involuntary servitude Article
13 Bill of Rights
and because Douglas ask the officer to show him the
evidence of the speed he was traveling which is a verbal
challenge to the officers position of law.
Right to face his private accuser and burden of
proof is on the State,
not the Private,
the arresting
officer,
Corporal Jose Orozco belligerently took him into custody and booked him in
down town Hillsboro, TX. at the Hillsboro City Jail in
order to
force him to under duress to comply to his demands and
caused Douglas to be put in a reckless endangerment situation without
him being convicted of any crime
which is incarceration and damages to the Private,
(Douglas) with, No Due
Process of Law?
Now! Regardless of what a public servant officer thinks
is the law base on his training which purely is about
Statutes and Codes his first responsibility is to
Douglas's Inalienable Rights base on his Oath and the
responsibility to his Oath defined in the Declaration of
Independence listed in the foundations of law, FACT # 2. If he does not do this he is in felony
breech of his fiduciary duty to the Constitution and
Bill of Rights which puts him in what is called an
Outlaw position.
Constitutionally, the first violation of Rights took
place when he was detained by the officer which demanded zzzzzzz papers know as
licenses and registration please. Nazi Germany, 1930, internal
travel papers, Court Case Miller
verses US demonstrates a Right cannot be converted into
crime based on the lack of paper. Article
5 prohibits you having to give personal information,
by force to a agent of the courts that can be used
against you in a court of law.
For the officer to demand papers for travel, Article 13
Bill of Rights, mandates that there can be no
involuntary servitude or force contracts.
The question is
Hillsboro incorporated. Under the Constitution there
to be a speculation of a crime there has to be a private
accuser and there can be no crime without damages on the
individual's part. Where is the damaged party?
His father was then told that to bring the money down to
the precinct that night to satisfy the speeding ticket.
Douglas was data based on the Texas district
Fusion Center as well. No official visit to the
Magistrate Judge to determine the merits of the
officer's claim of crime or charge or court date was
established before this demand for the money and therefore
it was detainment, punishment which constitute
damages without due process before his chance for
justice. Basically they kidnapped him, committed a
conspiracy to extorted money without, court date or
proceedings which is violation of their own civil law
procedure? Also, Douglas, weather he understood or not
has Unalienable Rights guarantied by the Declaration of
Independence, the Supreme Law of the Land.
Another infraction and separate issue on Douglas was the
fact that there has just passed and signed by the
Governor effective immediately before this event took
place a State Statue Texas Law that prohibits personal
data being entered into the Fusion Centers on pull over
and detainment. The
Fusion Center State Senate Bill 3324
if this case is proceeded by violation of what
Government calls Civil Rights. Civil Rights are not
Rights but privileges given by a State or Federal
Government but this is a valid argument.
UNDERSTANDING
the LAW and DUTY
Law enforcement has more and more infringed on these
Rights on the premise that you have contracted them by
consent to the State and Federal Statutes and that the
Common law has been codify into Congressional, corporate
law by case law. This is not true. How can Corporate law
over rule what was mandated to be Unalienable and given
by the Creator and how can there not be a contradiction
of their Oath to the Constitution in this matter? If
they are working on the argument of consent that consent
has to be done with open disclosure of what they are
giving up with no duress or fraud involved otherwise the
contract is repugnant to the Constitution and is null
and void, "Mabury verses Madison" & "Norton verses
Shelby".
Now this opens up arguments in Bill of Rights, Civil
Law Procedure, Contract Law, etc., No matter how
many Congressional Statutes that are created from State
Congress or the Federal Congress no Statue, Code, Rule
or Regulation can over ride what has been mandated in
the Founding Documents as self evident and giving by the
Creator. The Right to Travel not permission to drive has
been well documented through our case history and is
very relevant in this case.
This crime has been committed upon Douglas and the community of
Hillsboro and the public servants that participated in this crime should be
fired and prosecuted. If this is not dealt with then who is next to have this
done to them in disrespect to there Rights? Make a statement here that this kind
of abuse is got to stop and law enforcement must respect their Oath to the
Constitution as well as the Statutory laws not in conflict with the Constitution
 
LOGIC AND
THE LAW
The question #1. is the Bill of Rights still invoked in our
modern society or are you simply a subject of the State
classified as a statutory citizen? Unless you as the Private
decide to contract for your security with a corporation then
your Un-Alienable Rights are applicable to your position as
originally found to be self evident in The Declaration of
Independence. One understanding for this is that Article 13 of
the Bill of Rights is fact that there can no involuntary
servitude therefore there cannot be any forced contracts.
Another words no one can hold a gun to your head to get you to
agree to sign? The question
in law then becomes was the contract disclosed to you with this
understanding that you would comply with the Statutes, Codes,
Rules or Regulations or was there fraud, duress or
non-disclosure involved therefore propagating the perception of
negating your true Creator Given Rights. This action would null and void
any contracts with the State. This would then put you in a true
position and in full application relating to the Constitution,
Declaration of Independence and the, Bill of Rights?
This Blog is to be updated on a continuously basis

CALL TO ACTION TO ALL
DEFENDERS:
WE WELCOME YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS POSTIING AT
OUR DEFENDER FORUM ON THE WEBSITE LISTED BELOW. ANY INFORMATION THAT YOU
MAY CONTRIBUTE WILL BE WELCOMED
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS ARTICLE TO
ANYWHERE IT CAN BE EFFECTIVE IN WEBSITES, NEWSPAPERS,
FACE BOOK, ETC. LETS CARRY ON THE RIGHTEOUS POSITION OF
TRUTH AND JUSTICE. WE MUST BE ALL FOR ONE AND ONE FOR
ALL
Eric Kiesche,
National Chairman/ Founder/ Writer/ Designer/ The Spike!
for our Republic
"The Order of Constitution
Defenders"
CONSTITUTIONDEFENDER.COM
|